Archive for category Creativity
They all have their uses, but seem to be just too shallow for tech, and life.
Face it, when you need an answer to a technical question or learn about something that isn’t in Wikipedia, chances are that Google will lead you to a blog post. Not a Facebook page (not indexed, and rarely technical). Not Twitter (how much can you explain in 140 characters?) And probably not Google+, either (although there is sometimes good discussion there).
Nope, you’re going to end up at someone’s blog post. Someone who faced the same problem, did their homework, pulled together from other sources, and solved the problem.
Go to Twitter for breaking news, Facebook for your friends, and Google+ for interesting discussions.
But the next time you solve a problem, how about you contribute to the world-wide-knowledgebase via a blog post somewhere?
You have all probably noticed that this blog isn’t updated very often. I’m afraid I’ve fallen into what Vernor Vinge once described to me as the “Usenet trap”.
A long time ago I was fortunate enough to spend time with him on a semi-regular basis, and even shared an office with him for one semester. At that time I asked him if he ever read Usenet News (which tells you how long ago this was), and he said (paraphrasing) “No. If you are reading, you aren’t writing, and I want to spend more time creating, and not all my time consuming.” At that time he was working on the draft that became “A Fire Upon the Deep.”
I spent some time over the past week, looking at how much time I spent consuming “media” (reading) as opposed to writing (other than work). Read the rest of this entry »
It seems everyone has one. I can’t really add much to all the tens of thousands of words that have been written, so I’ll just point you to the beginning:
Peter Bregman has an interesting hypothesis: we are too connected to information, and we need “boredom time” to be creative and productive.
He makes the case that carrying an always connected device (in his case an iPad) allowed him to be too productive, that is, productive at any time of the day or night. He allowed work and activity to fill all the time in his life because he had a device that made that easy. In other words he discovered an aspect of Parkinson’s Law.
I think he is on to something, but I’d like to suggest that it is really the over-ease of access to information that is the problem. With Google (or any other search engine) on every device we carry with us, there is never a need to ask “I wonder if…”. We never have to think about that question, we can always get the answer immediately.
When was the last time that any dinner time (or work time) question remained contested? In other words when was the last time you had a discussion, an argument (in the classic sense) about a question of fact? It is too easy to immediately answer those questions, and therefore we are losing the ability to question authority and make creative arguments to support our positions.
I believe that the reverie of a chain of “I wonder if…” questions can lead down some very creative pathways, and too many of us are short-circuiting that process. Science fiction is some of the most creative literature around, in terms of “ideas per page”, and it requires the creation of “what if…” chains for which you choose muliple non-obvious answers. Easy access to information, too soon, short-circuits the creative process that can lead you into those great “out of the box” ideas that make all the difference.
So, it’s not always about getting those hours of uninterrupted time, it’s about making some of that time unconnected and unstructured time.
There’s been a lot of discussion in the sysadmin community about turning off your email client to get those uninterrupted hours to make progress on projects. I believe that we also need to turn off search engines to get unconnected and unstructured thinking time.
So don’t always focus on time management throughout your entire life, and give yourself permission to explore “what if…” on your own.